Our firmOur servicesOur teamYour career with usOur publications

$15 Million Claim against Concordia University Dismissed

Langlois Kronström Desjardins recently successfully defended Concordia University in a $15 million action in damages launched against it by a former student who was expelled from the University for academic misconduct.

The claimant, a self-represented litigant, had launched an action in damages seeking compensation for his expulsion, as well as an application for judicial review of the University’s decision to expel him. On the advice and counsel of Langlois Kronström Desjardins, Concordia successfully moved for dismissal of the claim in judicial review on the ground that it was time barred.  The lower court’s judgment was confirmed by the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court of Canada refused to entertain claimant’s appeal.

In connection with claimant’s claim in damages, Concordia argued that the claimant had failed to inscribe his case in damages within the peremptory time limit set out in the Code of Civil Procedure and, therefore, that his case was deemed to have been discontinued by operation of law. The Superior Court followed Langlois Kronström Desjardins’s contentions and found  that no person, whether represented or unrepresented by counsel, is exempt from compliance with the rules of procedure, and that those who choose not to be represented must acknowledge the risks associated therewith and live with the consequences of that choice.

In a remarkable passage, the motion judge, in response to claimant’s allegations of bad faith on the part of Langlois Kronström Desjardins, set the record straight: “Plaintiff suggested to the Court, during argument on the present motion, that Defendant’s legal counsel have shown bad faith in their court proceedings and in their representations made at the management conferences presided over by the undersigned. This is simply untrue. Defendant counsel’s conduct in this case has been in good faith and has also been exemplary in sometimes difficult circumstances.”

Dimitri Maniatis and Rébecca St-Pierre are very pleased to have acted on behalf of Concordia University in this matter.

 
 ope_fondblanc_an.jpg

 
 
Latest deals and cases
A major victory for TELUS
We recently acted for a major telecommunications company (TELUS) in injunction proceedings brought by the second-lowest bidder on a tender put out by SigmaSanté (formerly Approvisionnement Montréal) on behalf of six healthcare institutions with a total of 29 locations. The call for tenders was for the installation of an IP telephone system and the upgrading of IT systems. The plaintiff sought an interlocutory injunction to suspend performance of the contract, which had been awarded to our client, the lowest bidder.
All client work
 
   
 
 
Events and conferences
Sébastien Laprise to speak on the Plan Nord
Sébastien Laprise, a partner at Langlois Kronström Desjardins, will be speaking at the 68th congress of ACRGTQ, the Québec association of highway and major infrastructure construction contractors. His presentation will be entitled "Le Plan Nord: Opportunities and Constraints", and will deal with the legal environment surrounding this vast project for the development of northern Québec that is still being shaped by the input of the various stakeholders involved. His presentation will be given on Thursday, January 19th at the Québec City Convention Centre.
All events and conferences
 
     
 
 
Our publications
The Supreme Court of Canada rules on the federal government’s proposed national securities commission

On December 22, 2011, the Supreme Court of Canada (the “Court”) rendered a decision declaring the federal government’s Proposed Canadian Securities Act (the “Act”) a “comprehensive foray by Parliament into the realm of securities regulation”1. The effect of the Act would have been to create a single national securities commission in Canada.

pdf To download this legal buletin, click here

All publications
 
     
 
 
 
© 2011 Langlois Kronström Desjardins, L.L.P. All Rights Reserved.