Our firmOur servicesOur teamYour career with usOur publications

$15 Million Claim against Concordia University Dismissed

Langlois Kronström Desjardins recently successfully defended Concordia University in a $15 million action in damages launched against it by a former student who was expelled from the University for academic misconduct.

The claimant, a self-represented litigant, had launched an action in damages seeking compensation for his expulsion, as well as an application for judicial review of the University’s decision to expel him. On the advice and counsel of Langlois Kronström Desjardins, Concordia successfully moved for dismissal of the claim in judicial review on the ground that it was time barred.  The lower court’s judgment was confirmed by the Court of Appeal, and the Supreme Court of Canada refused to entertain claimant’s appeal.

In connection with claimant’s claim in damages, Concordia argued that the claimant had failed to inscribe his case in damages within the peremptory time limit set out in the Code of Civil Procedure and, therefore, that his case was deemed to have been discontinued by operation of law. The Superior Court followed Langlois Kronström Desjardins’s contentions and found  that no person, whether represented or unrepresented by counsel, is exempt from compliance with the rules of procedure, and that those who choose not to be represented must acknowledge the risks associated therewith and live with the consequences of that choice.

In a remarkable passage, the motion judge, in response to claimant’s allegations of bad faith on the part of Langlois Kronström Desjardins, set the record straight: “Plaintiff suggested to the Court, during argument on the present motion, that Defendant’s legal counsel have shown bad faith in their court proceedings and in their representations made at the management conferences presided over by the undersigned. This is simply untrue. Defendant counsel’s conduct in this case has been in good faith and has also been exemplary in sometimes difficult circumstances.”

Dimitri Maniatis and Rébecca St-Pierre are very pleased to have acted on behalf of Concordia University in this matter.

 
 ope_fondblanc_an.jpg

 
 
Latest deals and cases
Michel Lebeuf represents Agence Québec Plus in a major M&A transaction
On August 20, athletic footwear and apparel giant ASICS America announced the acquisition of its North American distributor Agence Québec Plus (AQP), based in Sherbrooke, Quebec. The amount of the transaction was not disclosed.
AQP will become an ASICS subsidiary on August 31. The current chief executive of AQP, Denis Custeau, will continue in that position, and the internal structure of the company will remain unchanged. AQP's annual sales are on the order of US$48 million. Michel Lebeuf, a partner in the Montréal office of Langlois Kronström  Desjardins, acted for AQP in this matter.
All client work
 
   
 
 
Events and conferences
Tina Hobday, Conference Speaker for the Association of Social Work Boards

Tina Hobday, a partner in the Montréal office of Langlois Kronström Desjardins, was a speaker for the Association of Social Work Boards (ASWB) at its Spring Education Meeting. The event was held from May 13 to 16 at the Francis Marion Hotel in Charleston, South Carolina. On Saturday, May 15 from 8:30 a.m. to 12 p.m. Tina Hobday and ASWB legal advisor Dale Atkinson shared a session entitled Legal Issues Confronting Boards Faced with Shifting Resources.

All events and conferences
 
     
 
 
Our publications
The Supreme Court decision

The Supreme Court of Canada decides that the remedy under section 124 of An Act respecting labour standards for
dismissal without good and sufficient cause is of public order, even for unionized employees.
The matter of S.F.P.C. v. Quebec.

pdf To download this pdf capsule, click here

All publications
 
     
 
 
 
© 2010 Langlois Kronström Desjardins, S.E.N.C.R.L. Tous droits réservés.